Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 237

Assignment Example She grows up experiencing joy with Nel Wright, who is her best friend. The two are inseparable friends, even though their backgrounds and personality are different. Sula is an independent character who has minimal commitments. She got the independent characteristic from her mother, who acted in a similar manner. Nel Wright is a character who is the opposite of Sula. Her physical characteristic is plain and also light colored. Her physical appearance contrasts sharply to the black and mysterious features of Sula. The Bottom society considers Nel as a girl of good character and morals, because of her obedient and quite nature. The family background of Nel is good, and it is respected in the society. Nel desires individuality, and this is what drives her to seek friendship with the person like Sula, who has the desired qualities of independence, strength and bravery. Helene Wright is the mother of Nel. She was the daughter of Rochelle, who worked as a prostitute in Orleans Creole. Helen was raised by her very religious grandmother, called Cecile. Hellen was married off to Wiley Wright when she was aged 16 years. Eva is the grandmother of Sula, who is illustrated throughout the novel. She is very instrumental in determining the direction of Sula, and in the development of the plot of the novel. She is a very colorful character in the novel. She is very hopeful, even though her husband left her with children at a young age. Eva cut off her leg, with the intention of obtaining insurance money. The move shows love and determination, because the money was used to take care of her family. Eva is a compassionate character, because she turned her house to a boarding facility that accommodates diverse individuals, for instance, the â€Å"dewey boys†. The informally adopted Deweys were inseparable, even though they are physically different. BoyBoy Peace is illustrated as a reckless character; this is because he abandoned her young Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 163 Assignment Example Action research is an alternative approach to change in an organization. It requires the change facilitators with the ability to give specific attention to the personal and collective processes of action and reflection. Using this approach will, therefore, requires the change agents in Arc Limit Cinema to be both leaders and researchers in the process of finding the opportunities for change. In this case, research on the issues related to the market, internal and external factors promoting of inhibiting change in the organization should be done (Cameron & Green 2012, p. 132). In Lewin’s model for change, there are three identified phases of effective change process. Unfreezing, change process and refreezing. This approach will require the change agent at Arc Limit Cinema to recognize the need to change and to be uncomfortable with the present situation. This may be concerning the operations, production, customer service or marketing. The identified flaws then lead to the change implementation, and after the change is done, the organization need to be re-stabilized through refreezing (Cameron & Green 2012, p. 132). This model, therefore, implies that for a change to occur in Arc Light, the inputs that the organization, its initial environment in terms of partnerships, markets and the general reputation of the organization must be harnessed to give a strategy that is compatible with the organizations structures. The effects of this are positive change that will give results that will improve the organizations situation. In order to understand the performance of an organization, this model recommends first to understand the basic elements of performance. These are inputs, strategy, output and processes. In the USC strategy, these basic elements can be identified as: Output. The strategy expects the outputs to be a success of the students and the fulfilment of their ambitions. This will also lead to a feeling of satisfaction of the

Negotiation, Ethics and Effective Leadership Essay

Negotiation, Ethics and Effective Leadership - Essay Example The whole notion of negotiation is built on the ethical quicksand. One study found out that 28% of the negotiators lied about at least one issue during the negotiation procedure. Another study found out that 100% of the negotiators either failed to actively lie or reveal a problem during the negotiation process. Although bald faced lies during negotiations are wrong but concealments, omissions and evasions are very necessary for a negotiation process. Negotiations are often treated as an amoral game where ethical concerns are sidelined for substantive gains (Schneider & Honeyman, 2006, P. 178). Ethically ambiguous tactics are common in negotiation. These are tactics that have more than one connotation regarding what is right and appropriate. Again the use of deception is very common in negotiation. It is driven by variety of individual differences and situational factors. It is also driven by negotiators need to increase his power, availability of tactics that are marginally ethical, opportunities for opportunism, competitive orientation to negotiation and variety of situational factors that makes easier for negotiators to act without any detection. He has made a half hearted attempt to reach out to Iran which has been short lived and has actually reverted to Bush`s administration policy towards Iran. The deception is very clear in the negotiation between Iran and President Obama. Iran has been quite unreceptive to Obamas` peaceful approach although President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has always told that he is ready for talks with the US President Barrack Obama. Iran has always attempted towards making nuclear enrichment plants inside the mountain base of Iranian Revolutionary Guards near the religious centre of Qum in spite of receiving several warnings from the US President. Global Nuclear Disarmament treaties have often been violated by rough regimes like Iran. Although Iran claims that it complies with its responsibilities under the Nuclear Non Proliferation Tre aty, it has never resorted to peace. Obamas` administration policy contrasts largely from that of Bush in his dealing with Iran. He has made several attempts to engage Iran in negotiations on the nuclear issues rather than just focusing on increasing sanctions on Iran. This approach was not significantly altered in spite of the Iranian dispute in June 12 2009 over its election. However till date Iran has not agreed to implement it agreement of sending most of its enriched uranium to Russia and France for reprocessing. Negotiation skills help an individual in getting what they want from others. The negotiation skills help in achieving the goals of the leader. Military professionals use negotiation skills at the operational and strategic level. It helps them to maintain control over their jurisdiction. They can also use this skill to avert or successfully counter opposition and to negotiate among conflicting interests. It also helps the leaders to exude a sincere belief in the set of goals by engaging others to invest themselves in attaining these goals by forging a consensus on the desirability and vitality o the goals. Moreover Tehran`s support of the Lebanese terrorism in 1980 which involved airline hijacking also proved that Iran was not interested in creating a peaceful situation. In this incident

The article by Joachim Wambsganss Essay Example for Free

The article by Joachim Wambsganss Essay The article by Joachim Wambsganss discusses the nature and functions of gravitational lenses that both help and challenge our understanding of the celestial bodies in the universe. As the author rightly puts it, the sky is filled with many mirages and mysteries to be explored. The gravitational lenses make the universe into a palace of glasses where one images reflects into multiple images creating an illusory effect. It is curious to know the nature and functions of these gravitational lenses that both help and defy our understanding of the universe. . Gravitational lensing is a budding and promising area of study in astronomy. It helps astronomers to study the dark matters in the universe. It is also useful to investigate the structure of quasars, black holes and find earth like planets around other stars. Â  Gravitational light deflection was identified and accepted, though not accurately. Einstein was doubtful about it though he predicted that a foreground star could magnify the image of a background star as a result of gravitational lensing. More optimistic was the Swiss-American astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky with his predictions on lensing effects of galaxies. At last the speculation came to an end in 1979 when astronomers actually saw evidence of lensing. Generally light that comes from a celestial body goes straight. But when there is any object in between it deflects and the deviation causes many distortions to what we see in the space. It is interesting to note that any thing that possesses mass can serve like a lens. It need not emit light on its own. Four consequences of gravitational lensing are identified. They are: 1.Change of Position, 2. Magnification and Demagnification, 3.Deformation, 4. Multiplication. The perceptible location of star or galaxy changes because of the deflection of gravitational light Secondly, it is also possible to see the magnification of brightness of a star or quasar because of the deflection of light. Sometimes the light demagnifies. Thirdly, galaxies can appear long-drawn-out into arcs or bananas because of the deflection of light. Finally, the multiple images are the result of strong gravitational lensing. How Lensing Works The gravitational –lens system has three components embedded in the space. The distance source of light, an intervening mass that acts as a lens and an observer on the earth are the three which form a straight line. The distant source of light could be a star, quasar, or galaxy. The intervening mass that acts as a lens can be anything from a planet to a black hole. Light travels through the shortest distance, and it need not be a straight line always. Sometimes it can travel through a curve as well. The light bends when it reaches the curved space near a cosmic body. The degree of deflection depends on how close the rays get tot the body and on the mass of the body. The deflect ion angle is directly proportional to the mass and inversely proportional to the closest distance. Gravitational lenses are different from ordinary lenses in many ways. The ordinary lenses have a well-defined focal point whereas the gravitational varieties produce focal lines or surfaces. The typical gravitational lens also causes light rays to experience smaller deflections. The gravitational lensing is achromatic. When the lens system is asymmetric, i.e. when source, lens and observer are not in alignment, the lens has an oblong mass distribution – and the resulting ring breaks up into discrete variegated images. The lens magnifies different parts of the source by different amounts and the highest magnification occurs at caustic. When the alignment is very far off or the lens mass distribution is very spread out, the lensing is very weak. With the discovery of double quasar Q0957+ 561 gravitational lensing became an observable science. So far 64 double, triple and multiple quasars have been found. The CLASS (Cosmic Lens All-Sky Survey) project has mapped more than 10,000 radio sources and 17 multiply imaged systems. To identify whether it is real quasar or an illusion, observes have developed a checklist. They see whether the quasars lie at the same distance, whether their spectra is similar, whether there is any potential lens between the observer and the quasar and whether the brightness of each quasar fluctuates in the same way. When the galaxy lens is spherical it can distribute the light of background quasar or galaxy into a ring or circle called Einstein ring. About a dozen such rings are found. The important application of quasar lensing is to measure Hubble constant, which is a measure of size and expansion rate of universe. Multiple quasars can give insight into cosmological parameter called cosmological constant. It is essential to explain why the expansion of universe appears to be accelerating. The more is the expansion accelerated, the bigger the volume of space. Cosmological constant can not be more than 62 percent of the energy density of the universe. If the density is more, there could be more number of quasars. It supports smaller values of the cosmological constant. Quasars are unsteady by their nature and they tend to brighten and then dim on their own. Â  To distinguish microlensing fluctuations and intrinsic variability astronomers monitor multiple quasar systems. Â  In 1989 astronomers confirmed five multiple quasar systems. They conclude that innermost parts of quasar are hotter and bluer than outer parts. If lens is not single galaxy, but a cluster of galaxies then the image can be a kaleidoscope of strongly distorted arcs and arc lets. Studies on clusters of galaxies reveal that clusters are dominated by unseen dark matter. On an extremely large scale, the vast galaxy clusters of matter tend to be powerful lens. The wide spread shearing of galaxy images support the view that universe is giant cobweb of matter interspersed with voids. The article also focuses on MACHOs and Extra solar planets. MACHOs are collection of rogue planets, dead stars or black holes. However research says that the entire dark matter cannot be made entirely of MACHO. It also notes that stellar mass black holes may cause microlensing events. Stellar microlensing can even detect planets and the extra burst of brightening that might have been caused by planet candidates. Thus, the article ‘Gravity’s Kaleidoscope’ narrates interestingly how the study of illusions can lead us to the discovery of truth relating to celestial bodies in the universe.

The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant

The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant But shes cooped up in the house all day with nothing to do, and her days are marked with boredom beyond belief. Her only way out of dealing with it is to live in a fantasy world of glamour, wealth, and beautiful people.. And cant we all relate in some way to Mathildes desire to live a more exciting, glamorous life, even if we can only do it in daydreams? You also wont find a more perfect encapsulation in story form of an experience we can certainly all relate to: the if I hadnt lost that one thing! experience. Thats right, if you think losing something once ruined your day, just wait until you see what happens to Mathilde. Its painful to read about, yes, but sometimes its good to have a reminder of just how badly chance can ruin your life. Finally, if you like interesting plots and crafty endings with a twist, they dont get much more classic than this one. At the beginning of the story, we meet Mathilde Loisel, a middle-class girl who desperately wishes she were wealthy. Shes got looks and charm, but had the bad luck to be born into a family of clerks, who marry her to another clerk (M. Loisel) in the Department of Education. Mathilde is so convinced shes meant to be rich that she detests her real life and spends all day dreaming and despairing about the fabulous life shes not having. She envisions footmen, feasts, fancy furniture, and strings of rich young men to seduce. One day M. Loisel comes home with an invitation to a fancy ball thrown by his boss, the Minister of Education.. She doesnt have anything nice to wear, and cant possibly go! M. Loisel doesnt know what to do, and offers to buy his wife a dress suggests she go see her friend Mme. Forestier, a rich woman who can probably lend her something. Mathilde is able to borrow a gorgeous diamond necklace. The night of the ball arrives, and Mathilde has the time of her life. Everyone loves her (i.e., lusts after her) and she is absolutely thrilled. Mathilde suddenly dashes outside to avoid being seen in her shabby coat. But once back at home, Mathilde makes a horrifying discovery: the diamond necklace is gone. So he and Mathilde decide they have no choice but to buy Mme. Forestier a new necklace Buying the necklace catapults the Loisels into poverty for the next ten years. They lose their house, their maid, their comfortable lifestyle, and on top of it all Mathilde loses her good looks. After ten years, all the debts are finally paid, and Mathilde she wants to finally tell Mme. Forestier the sad story of the necklace and her ten years of poverty, and she does. At that point, Mme. Forestier, aghast, reveals to Mathilde that the necklace she lost was just a fake. It was worth only five hundred francs Shes charming, attractive, and, believes that she should have been born into a rich family. Instead she wound up in a family of employees and ended up marrying a little clerk in Department of Education (1). Our ordinary girl is convinced that shes meant for the extraordinary life of a fabulously rich girl. She hates her own humble surroundings and spends her time dreaming about fancy tapestries and tall footmen. While her husband slurps his stew she imagines grand banquets. A life of luxury is all the girl wants its what shes made for. But sadly, she doesnt lead the luxurious life of which she dreams. Consequently, she spends all her days weeping and feeling sorry for herself. She tears it open to find that she and her husband M. and Mme. (Monsieur and Madame) Loisel have been invited to a fancy party at the Minister of Educations palace. Her husband cant wait to see her reaction. Mme. Loisel is not happy about this. Shes got nothing to wear. This is enough to send her into tears. M. Loisel feels awful Mathilde stops four hundred francs would probably do it. The date of the party approaches, and Mathilde is in a bad mood again. she doesnt have any to wear over her dress. M. Loisel suggests that Mathilde borrow some jewels from her rich friend Mme. Forestier. Mathilde isnt satisfied with anything she sees, but then Mme. Forestier brings her another box containing a spectacular diamond necklace. Mathilde is beside herself. Its the only thing she wants! Mme The evening of the party arrives, and Mathilde is a smash hit. All the men including the Minister notice her. Shes in heaven. Her husband, meanwhile, has also been having a great time: hes been off dozing in a corner since midnight. M. Loisel brings the coats. But Mathilde is self-conscious: her coat is so shabby compared to the rest of her appearance. So she dashes off into the street to avoid being seen. . Mathilde doesnt want to go back to her ordinary life But the diamond necklace is missing. She screams. Mathilde, meanwhile, spends the day stuck in a chair, too traumatized to do anything. When he returns, M. Loisel has Mathilde write to Mme. Forestier to say that they broke the clasp of the necklace and are having it fixed. They need to buy more time. A week passes, and still no sign of the necklace. M. Loisel, who already looks five years older, decides they have no choice but to replace it. So he takes out enough loans to pay for the necklace and to ensure that his life will be ruined forever and then goes back to the jewelers to buy it. Mathilde takes the replacement necklace to Mme. Forestier, whos miffed that she didnt return her necklace sooner. Mathildes worried shell notice the substitution. Now Mathilde and M. Loisel are poor. They have to dismiss the maid and move into an attic. Mathilde starts to do the housework, and run the errands, haggling at stores over every cent. This goes on for ten years, until all the interest on the Loisels loans is paid. Mathilde is now a rough, hard woman, and her looks are ruined. She occasionally thinks of how her life might have been different if she hadnt lost the necklaceà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ One Sunday, Mathilde goes for a stroll on the Champs Elysà ©es (main street of Paris that you see in all the movies), and notices a beautiful young-looking woman walking with her child. Its Mme. Forestier, who hasnt aged one day. Mathilde decides its time to tell her everything that happened. When Mathilde greets Mme. Forestier by her first name, Mme. Forestier does not recognize her former friend, because she looks so different Mathilde explains that shed lost the diamond necklace, but replaced it, and has spent the last ten years paying for the replacement. (Mme. Forestier apparently hadnt noticed the difference) Her diamond necklace, she tells Mathilde, was a fake. It was worth at most five hundred francs. The Necklace Theme of Wealth The Necklace gets its title from the gorgeous piece of diamond jewelry that drives the storys plot. The expensive nature of the necklace is not the only way in which wealth is central to this story. The main character of The Necklace is obsessed with wealth. She wants nothing else than to escape from her shabby middle-class life with a shabby middle-class husband and live the glamorous life for which she was born. Shes so jealous of her one wealthy friend it hurts. When Mathildes given the chance to get decked out in diamonds and go to a ritzy party to mingle with all the beautiful people, it seems like her dreams have finally become a reality. Then she loses the borrowed diamond necklace, gets cast into poverty, and learns what it means to truly live without money. Questions About Wealth Is Mathilde a greedy character? What signs can you find that she is or is not? Why does Mathilde want to live the life of the rich so much? Are her dreams understandable, or do they seem silly and exaggerated? What difference does money make in the lives of the storys characters? Does the story itself have a message about whether wealth is a good thing? Is it shown to be worth pursuing, or not worth pursuing? Chew on This Mathildes greed is revealed in her inability to be satisfied by anything. The Necklace Theme of Women and Femininity Mathilde Loisel, the main character of The Necklace, is a 19th century French version of a desperate housewife. Because shes a woman in a mans world, she has almost no control over her life. She finds herself married to a husband she doesnt care for, and cooped up in a house she despises. What she wants more than anything else is to be desirable to other men. And whats particularly irritating is that she has all the womanly virtues she needs in order to be desirable: shes charming, graceful, beautiful. Shes just doesnt have the necessary wealth. Is she a victim of the patriarchal society in which she lives? Or is she just a shallow and materialistic character? Questions About Women and Femininity In what ways is Mathilde a typical woman according to the story? How are Mathildes desires feminine desires? How might Mathildes being a woman be a cause of her unhappiness? Do you think it is the primary cause of her unhappiness? Why or why not? How are wealth and femininity connected in The Necklace? Where in the story do you see a connection? Chew on This Mathildes desires are feminine, because what most interests her is attracting male attention. Wealth and femininity are intimately bound together in The Necklace. The Necklace Theme of Pride You can read The Necklace as a story about greed, but you can also read it as a story about pride. Mathilde Loisel is a proud woman. She feels far above the humble circumstances (and the husband) shes forced to live with by her common birth. In fact, her current situation disgusts her. Shes a vain one too, completely caught up in her own beauty. It could be that it is also pride that prevents Mathilde and her husband from admitting theyve lost an expensive necklace. After the loss of the necklace makes Mathilde poor, and her beauty fades, she may learn a pride of a different sort: pride in her own work and endurance. Questions About Pride What signs are there at the beginning of the story that Mathilde is a proud woman? In what way is she proud? Of what is she proud? Is it pride which prevents the Loisels from telling Mme. Forestier theyve lost her necklace? If so, whose pride is it? Or is it something else? Does Mathildes experience of poverty humble her? Does it make her proud in a different way? Chew on This Its M. Loisels pride that is responsible for the tragedy at the end of the story. It is not pride, but the Loisels sense of honor, which is responsible for the tragedy at the end of the story. The Necklace Theme of Suffering The Necklace is a difficult story to read. If you think about it, its about nonstop suffering, caused by the cruelty of life and chance. At the opening, we meet Mathilde, the classic dissatisfied housewife, who spends her days weeping about how boring and shabby her life is. Mathilde finds one moment of real joy when she goes to a ball, but chance is cruel. Her happiest night becomes her worst nightmare when she loses the diamond necklace she borrowed. Then she and her husband experience a very different sort of suffering: the suffering of real poverty. And all of this is just the buildup to one devastating endingà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ Questions About Suffering What is responsible for Mathildes unhappiness? Is it her own fault, or is it the fault of her circumstances? Is Mathildes suffering worse when shes a poor woman? In what ways might it be, and in what ways might it not be? Chew on This Mathilde is responsible for her own suffering; she just refuses to be happy. Mathilde suffers less when shes poor than when she was comfortable but dissatisfied. Quote #1 She was one of those pretty and charming girls, born by a blunder of destiny in a family of employees. She had no dowry, no expectations, no means of being known, understood, loved, married by a man rich and distinguished. (1) The first thing we know about Mathilde is that she seems meant for a life of wealth and luxury, but instead is born into a lowly middle-class family. The conflict between what she wants (which is quite a lot) and what she has is established immediately. Quote #2 She let her mind dwell on the quiet vestibules, hung with Oriental tapestries, lighted by tall lamps of bronze, and on the two tall footmen in knee breeches who dozed in the large armchairs, made drowsy by the heat of the furnace. She let her mind dwell on the large parlors, decked with old silk, with their delicate furniture, supporting precious bric-a-brac, and on the coquettish little rooms, perfumed, prepared for the five oclock chat with the most intimate friends, men well known and sought after, whose attentions all women envied and desired. (3) Mathilde spends her time living in a dream world, in which she imagines all the fabulous things shed have if she were rich. The most detail we get in the otherwise sparse story comes in Maupassants descriptions of the fancy stuff Mathilde wants. But being rich also means more than just nice stuff to her: it means having the glamour to attract men. Quote #3 She had a rich friend, a comrade of her convent days, whom she did not want to go and see any more, so much did she suffer as she came away. (6) Mathilde wants to be wealthy so badly that shes driven mad with jealousy by the one rich friend she has, Mme. Forestier. She cant bear to see Mme. Forestier, because it brings her within arms reach of the world of wealth she wants so badly, but cant have. Quote #4 She reflected a few seconds, going over her calculations, and thinking also of the sum which she might ask without meeting an immediate refusal and a frightened exclamation from the frugal clerk. (24) It looks like Mathilde is milking her husband for all hes worth here. Was her the crying fit put on so she could seize the opportunity to get a fancy dress from him? Quote #5 It annoys me not to have a jewel, not a single stone, to put on. I shall look wretched. I would almost rather not go to this party. (33) OK, so after shes gotten an expensive dress out of her husband, Mathilde refuses to go to the party again. Shes still not satisfied. She needs jewels. Does this mean Mathilde actually expects her husband to get her a piece of jewelry? Quote #6 All at once she discovered, in a box of black satin, a superb necklace of diamonds, and her heart began to beat with boundless desire. Her hands trembled in taking it up. She fastened it round her throat, on her high dress, and remained in ecstasy before herself. (48) Maybe diamonds are a girls best friend. Just seeing and touching something expensive and beautiful drives Mathilde crazy. Shes in ecstasy over a necklace. The necklace may be a symbol for wealth, or glamour in the story. Quote #8 Mme. Loisel learned the horrible life of the needy. She made the best of it, moreover, frankly, heroically. The frightful debt must be paid. She would pay it. They dismissed the servant; they changed their rooms; they took an attic under the roof. (98) After losing the necklace, Mathilde now finds herself actually poor. Though she felt herself poor before, she was fairly comfortable, and middle class. Now her life is much harder. Quote #9 The other did not recognize her, astonished to be hailed thus familiarly by this woman of the people (111-112) Mme. Forestier and Mathilde are now greatly separated by their wealth, which translates into social class. The class difference is so big that it seems improper for Mathilde to even address Mme. Forestier by her first name. Their classes are also immediately apparent from the way they look. Oh, my poor Mathilde. But mine were false. At most they were worth five hundred francs! (128) Mme. Forestier reveals that the diamond necklace Mathilde lost was actually a fake. Does the falsehood of the jewels symbolize the falsehood of wealth? Does it change the way we think of Mathildes former dreams? Or, on another note, does it perhaps mean something about Mme. Forestier? If her best piece of jewelry is a fake, maybe shes not quite as wealthy as she initially seems. She had no dowry, no expectations, no means of being known, understood, loved, married by a man rich and distinguished; and she let them make a match for her with a little clerk in the Department of Education. (1) Mathildes future prospects are not in her own hands. Shes a woman, which means the quality of her life will basically depend upon her family and her husband. And in both respects, shes out of luck, as far as shes concerned. With so much powerlessness, its no wonder shes frustrated and dissatisfied. She was simple since she could not be adorned; but she was unhappy as though kept out of her own class; for women have no caste and no descent, their beauty, their grace, and their charm serving them instead of birth and fortune. Their native keenness, their instinctive elegance, their flexibility of mind, are their only hierarchy; and these make the daughters of the people the equals of the most lofty dames. (2) The narrator is suggesting that looks and charm make the woman, not wealth or good birth. According to this train of thought, a pretty, charming poor woman can be the equal of the most lofty dame. This is certainly the way Mathilde feels about herself she has the looks and the charm to be better at being a woman than most rich women. Its telling that the two virtues of a woman are the qualities that make them attractive to men. We dont hear anything about intelligence, or kindness, or creativityà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ She had no dresses, no jewelry, nothing. And she loved nothing else; she felt herself made for that only. She would so much have liked to please, to be envied, to be seductive and sought after. (5) Mathilde wants to be desired by men. To some extent, even her desire for wealth is just derivative of that. Her highest wish is to be approved of and wanted by someone else. But by a violent effort she had conquered her trouble, and she replied in a calm voice as she wiped her damp cheeks (20) Mathilde comes across as overly sensitive and emotional. She has to work very hard to control her emotions. Theres a feminine stereotype for you on which Maupassant is playing. No; theres nothing more humiliating than to look poor among a lot of rich women. (37) Wealth and womanhood are intimately bound up in Mathildes mind. She wants to look wealthy so she can compete with the rich women. The day of the party arrived. Mme. Loisel was a success. She was the prettiest of them all, elegant, gracious, smiling, and mad with joy. All the men were looking at her, inquiring her name, asking to be introduced. All the attaches of the Cabinet wanted to dance with her. The Minister took notice of her. (53) Mathildes a huge hit. She gets all the men to pay attention her, including the most important one of all (the minister). This is the best moment of her life. She danced with delight, with passion, intoxicated with pleasure, thinking of nothing, in the triumph of her beauty, in the glory of her success, in a sort of cloud of happiness made up of all these tributes, of all the admirations, of all these awakened desires, of this victory so complete and so sweet to a womans heart. (54) The narrator seems to be suggesting here that Mathildes desires to look glamorous and beautiful and be desired by men are more generally womans desires. Thats what makes women happy and pleases their womanly hearts. She went away about four in the morning. Since midnight her husband had been dozing in a little anteroom with three other men whose wives were having a good time. (55) M. Loisel could care less about the party hes just happy to have an opportunity to sleep. And hes not the only man in that situation, either. What does that mean? Maybe being a man he has different desires than his wifes womanly ones. Or maybe hes not interested in scouting out other mens wives because hes already got an attractive and charming wife of his own. Mathilde, on the other hand, doesnt seem to feel the same way about her husband. Mme. Loisel seemed aged now. She had become the robust woman, hard and rough, of a poor household. Badly combed, with her skirts awry and her hands red, her voice was loud, and she washed the floor with splashing water. (104) Once more, we see a connection between wealth and womanhood. According to Maupassant, Mathildes poverty makes her less feminine. Shes less attractive, and less graceful. Instead, shes hard and rough, and older looking. And apparently has a perpetual bad hair day. Then, one Sunday, as she was taking a turn in the Champs Elysà ©es, as a recreation after the labors of the week, she perceived suddenly a woman walking with a child. It was Mme. Forestier, still young, still beautiful, still seductive. (107) Unlike Mathilde, whos lost her looks and womanly charms to poverty, Mme. Forestier still looks good. All of that even after becoming a mother (another sign of womanhood). This makes us wonder why Mathilde doesnt have a child? She suffered intensely, feeling herself born for every delicacy and every luxury. She suffered from the poverty of her dwelling, from the worn walls, the abraded chairs, the ugliness of the stuffs. All these things, which another woman of her caste would not even have noticed, tortured her and made her indignant. (3) Mathilde feels herself to be better than her circumstances. She deserves more than she has, and is angry at the universe because she isnt getting it. Her dissatisfaction seems intimately connected to pride. When she sat down to dine, before a tablecloth three days old, in front of her husband, who lifted the cover of the tureen, declaring with an air of satisfaction, Ah, the good pot-au-feu. I dont know anything better than that, she was thinking of delicate repasts, with glittering silver, with tapestries peopling the walls with ancient figures and with strange birds in a fairy-like forest. (4) Mathildes husband is the opposite of Mathilde: hes happy with what he has. So far as hes concerned, theres nothing better than the good old stew his wife puts on the table every evening. All Mathilde can think of at the same moment is how much better things could be, and how shed rather be elsewhere. It all seems too low to her. Nothing. Only I have no clothes, and in consequence I cannot go to this party. Give your card to some colleague whose wife has a better outfit than I. (21) Instead of being happy with the invitation her husband has worked so hard to get, Mathildes first reaction is to be angry about it. If shes going to go, she just has to look the best, and she doesnt have any clothes that are nice enough Is she ever happy? Then again, would you want to go to the one nice party youve been invited to looking shabby? Its hard to tell whether Mathildes vanity, or greed, is making her overreact, or whether she does have nothing nice to wear. She saw at first bracelets, then a necklace of pearls, then a Venetian cross of gold set with precious stones of an admirable workmanship. She tried on the ornaments before the glass, hesitated, and could not decide to take them off and to give them up. She kept on asking: You havent anything else? (45-46) OK, so the jewel situation looks better: Mathildes found a treasure trove of the things. But shes still not satisfied. None of them makes her look as good as she wants to look. Her vanity once again seems to be making her greedy. The day of the party arrived. Mme. Loisel was a success. She was the prettiest of them all, elegant, gracious, smiling, and mad with joy. All the men were looking at her, inquiring her name, asking to be introduced. All the attaches of the Cabinet wanted to dance with her. The Minister took notice of her. (53) Mathildes the happiest shes ever been when everyone is admiring her. For once in her life, she can live up to the expectations her vanity has set for itself. Quote #6 He threw over her shoulders the wraps he had brought to go home in, modest garments of every-day life, the poverty of which was out of keeping with the elegance of the ball dress. She felt this, and wanted to fly so as not to be noticed by the other women, who were wrapping themselves up in rich furs. (56) After a successful evening at the ball, Mathildes too proud to let herself be seen wearing her shabby wrap. She needs to keep up the illusion. It could be that her rushing off like this is what causes her to lose the necklace. At the end of a week they had lost all hope. And Loisel, aged by five years, declared: We must see how we can replace those jewels. (86-87) Why does it never occur to Mathilde or M. Loisel to tell Mme. Forestier theyve lost the necklace? Instead, once they lose hope of finding it, M. Loisel decides the only solution is to buy a new one. Is he too proud to admit that its been lost? Or is it something else? (See M. Loisels Character Analysis for more of our thoughts on this.) Mme. Loisel learned the horrible life of the needy. She made the best of it, moreover, frankly, heroically. The frightful debt must be paid. She would pay it. (98) When Mathilde becomes poor, she is forced to work. Getting down to work and paying off the debts seems to make her proud in a new way. She can be proud of her hard work, and of her endurance. Meanwhile, her looks which used to be her pride and joy start to disappear. I brought you back another just like it. And now for ten years we have been paying for it. You will understand that it was not easy for us, who had nothing. At last, it is done, and I am mighty glad. (122) Mathilde is proud of all the work and suffering she and her husband have put into repaying for the necklace. It was an honorable and difficult thing to do. But theyve succeeded. Yes. You did not notice it, even, did you? They were exactly alike? And she smiled with proud and naÃÆ' ¯ve joy. (126-127) Mathilde is even more proud to learn that Mme. Forestier didnt notice the difference between her original necklace and the substitute. It adds extra validation to her work: she did fully make up for losing the necklace. Mathilde Loisel Character Analysis Mathilde Loisel wants to be a glamour girl. Shes obsessed with glamour with fancy, beautiful, expensive things, and the life that accompanies them. Unfortunately for her, she wasnt born into a family with the money to make her dream possible. Instead, she gets married to a little clerk husband and lives with him in an apartment so shabby it brings tears to her eyes (1). Cooped up all day in the house with nothing to do but cry over the chintzy furniture and the fabulous life shes not having, Mathilde hates her life, and probably her husband too. She weeps all day long, from chagrin, from regret, from despair, and from distress (6). She dreams day after day about escaping it all. Mathilde the Material Girl When it all comes down to it, Mathildes kind of a material girl. The most obvious thing she wants out of life is: expensive stuff. She suffered intensely, feeling herself born for every delicacy and every luxuryà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ She let her mind dwell on the quiet vestibules, hung with Oriental tapestries, lighted by tall lamps of bronze, and on the two tall footmen in knee breeches who dozed in the large armchairs, made drowsy by the heat of the furnace. She let her mind dwell on the large parlors, decked with old silk, with their delicate furniture, supporting precious bric-a-brac, and on the coquettish little rooms, perfumed, prepared for the five oclock chat with the most intimate friendsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ (3) Now why does Mathilde want all of these expensive, material possessions? It doesnt sound like she just wants it because shes money-obsessed. No, for Mathilde, the rich life is attractive because its glamorous, beautiful, exciting, fine, and unlike the dingy apartment in which she lives. The glamorous life has a certain kind of magical allure to it. A lot of the objects Mathilde wants are magical, like the tapestries peopling the walls with ancient figures and with strange birds in a fairy-like forest (4). For Mathilde, being wealthy amounts to living in a fairy tale. Being middle class amounts to boredom. She wants the fairy tale. Does her wish to live the fairy tale life make her greedy? Well, you ever notice how throughout the first part of the story, Mathildes never satisfied with anything? When her husband brings her the invitation all she can think about is the dress she wants. When she gets the dress, all she can think about is the jewels she doesnt have. And when she visits Mme. Forestier, shes not really satisfied with any of her jewel collection she keeps on asking, You havent anything else? (46). At least until she sees the most fabulous, expensive looking piece of jewelry, that is: the diamond necklace. So yes, by many standards, Mathilde is probably greedy. But her greeds not the end of the story. Material things arent the only things she wants. And theres also a deeper reason for her greed: dissatisfaction. We cant help but thinking that if she truly were satisfied with her life as it is (i.e., marriage, home, etc.) that she wouldnt be day-dreaming of a life she could never have. Mathilde and Men The other thing Mathilde wants? Men. Rich, attractive, charming, powerful men. That passage we quote above finishes with: the most intimate friends, men well known and sought after, whose attentions all women envied and desired (3). Just a little afterwards, were told: She would so much have liked to please, to be envied, to be seductive and sought after. (5) Whats interesting about Mathildes man-craze is that she seems to be more interested in seducing men than in the men themselves. Thats because what Mathilde really wants is to be wanted. More than being just desired, Mathilde wants to be glamorous gorgeous, charming, graceful, and thoroughly decked out in diamonds. The ultimate measure of being glamorous just happens to be being attractive to glamorous men. It all forms part of one big glamorous, fairy-tale world, the world about which Mathilde fantasizes. Whats particularly frustrating to Mathilde is that she knows shes got the natural looks and charms to be a splash with the rich playboy types she wants to impress. She just needs the outward signs of being wealthy, but cant afford the necessary clothing and jewelry. Mathildes quite vain about her feminine charms. Her vanity may be why shes unwilling to go to the ball unless she looks better than everyone else there. And when she does go to the ball, thats exactly what she is: Her triumph: The day of the party arrived. Mme. Loisel was a success. She was the prettiest of them all, elegant, gracious, smiling, and mad with joy. All the men The Necklace By Guy De Maupassant The Necklace By Guy De Maupassant I could say that Guy de Maupassants stories are just mundane waste of ink. Reading the story you understand things you have never thought about before or, by contrast, have already faced in your daily life. However, what do people think? Did all of them recognize the same the author did? Each of us should answer this question by own. Years passed but plays, novels on the theme, which Maupassant talked about, are still writing, and films are still shooting, why? There are things, which we remember, and things, which we cannot forget. In this work, I will try to describe the story called The Necklace and give full and needed for understanding information. The authors person is going to be talked about. Thus, let me start explaining. Henry-Renà ©-Albert-Guy de Maupassant The person of Henry-Renà ©-Albert-Guy de Maupassant is definitely interesting to talk about. Maupassants place of being born is not known in definite; however, it was perhaps the Chà ¢teau de Miromesniel,Dieppe. His biography is obviously worth of attention, but I will notice the most important and interesting facts of Maupassants life in order to understand his stories better. Maupassants relatives were noble. His parents divorced when he was a little boy of 11 years old. Maupassants first embryos appeared when he was studying at the Rouen Lycà ©e. Little Maupassant was gaining knowledge and skills from his friends; he improved his gifts and talents, which helped him in his poetry and writing. Maupassant was a civil servant in the period between 1872 and 1880 years. However, he had never loved working, all his free time Maupassant spent in women pursuit. He had a pseudonym Guy de Valmont, which he used in the articles in the newspapers. The 1880s years were productive and significant in the life of author, because he wrote about 300 short stories and 6 novels, including travel books and even a volume of verse. Unfortunately, Maupassant had a syphilis (he was then only 20 years old) that shortly after led him to the increasing of his mental disability. The author used narcotics, I think trying to be saved from awful and cruel headaches he suffered from. Critics have mentioned that Maupassant describes his diseases in some of his stories, giving main characters and heroes his own painful suffering and struggling. Allan Edgar Poe is one of those, whose stories encouraged Maupassant and made him to go through the same paths as Poe did (in some fiction horror stories). Stephen Kings novel The shining encouraged Maupassant when he was writing The Inn, which is very similar and common to The shining. I am sure it will be appropriately to notice some Maupasants words to understand his nature in full length: Now listen carefully: Marriage, to me, is not a chain but an association. I must be free, entirely unfettered, in all my actions -my coming and my going; I can tolerate neither control, jealousy, nor criticism as to my conduct. I pledge my word, however, never to compromise the name of the man I marry, nor to render him ridiculous in the eyes of the world. But that man must promise to look upon meas an equal, an ally, and not as an inferior, or as an obedient, submissive wife. My ideas, I know, are not like those of other people, but I shall never change them (Liukkonen, 2008, pg 2). The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant However, The Necklace at first was published in the newspaper Le Gaulois in Paris, France on February 17, 1884. It was a part of Maupassants collection of short stories called Tales of Day and Night, which appeared in 1885. She was one of those pretty and charming girls born, as though fate had blundered over her, into a family of artisans. She had no marriage portion, no expectations, no means of getting known, understood, loved, and wedded by a man of wealth and distinction; and she let herself be married off to a little clerk in the Ministry of Education with these words we faces in the beginning of the story and meeting a main character Madame Mathilde Loisel. She had a dream common to the American dream. She wants to become rich and have leisure. The story teaches readers many things. The middle-class Matilda discovers many ironic nuances through the story. Talking about the plot of the story, should be noticed that Maupassant is definitely talented, taking in account not much words he needed to illustrate many ideas and problems, which worries the humanity through the centuries. The story tells about middle-class woman Matilda, who wants to impress the society. Matilda Loisel was invited on the high-society affair (because her husband worked there), unfortunately, she understood that she had nothing to wear. A husband, Loisel, gave her money to buy a dress. Being unsatisfied, Matilda borrows a necklace from good friend Madame Forestier. After the affair, Matilda finds out that necklace is lost. Loisels started to find money to buy a new necklace: Loisel possessed eighteen thousand franks, which his father had left him. He borrowed it, asking for a thousand francs of one, five hundred of another, five louis of this one, and three louis of that one (The Necklace, pg 7). Finally, Loisels bought the same necklace and brought it to Madame Forestier. However, she said to the Matilda, who was proud and happy to give back the necklace, that her necklace was fake and coasted about 500 francs! To give money back Loisels have to have many limitations. Ten years of Matilda’s life have been robbed — and for what? For an evening of vanity and pride (Barthes, 2004, pg 1). Conclusion However, the story is successful among readers. It teaches readers many useful things. It triggers many emotions and feelings, especially sorrow and sadness. I liked how Maupassant said in his The Necklace: How strange life is, how fickle! How little is needed to ruin or to save! I agree with these words. The Necklace is worth of attention, undoubtedly! The story is about pride going before the fall. Hardship – is the known word for Matilda, but did she know what were the reasons of it? All money she earned during ten years she paid for one evening! People learn from the story how much one can pay for its pleasure and pride. Thus, Guy de Maupassant brought a lot of significance in the literature of whole world. Moreover, it is going with out saying and any doubt. References 1. Barthes, Roland. TheEiffelTowerand Other Mythologies. Tr. Howard, Richard.Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress. 2004. 2. Clyde K. Hyder, Algernon Swinburne: The Critical Heritage, 1995, p.185. 3. Harriss, Joseph. The Tallest Tower. Unlimited Publishing LLC, 2004, pg 15, 16. 4. James, Henry. Guy de Maupassant, reprinted in his Partial Portraits, Macmillan, 1888, pp. 243-87. 5. Liukkonen, Petri and Personen, Ari. Guy de Maupassant (1850-1893) – in full Henry-Renà ©-Albert-Guy de Maupassant. Kuusankosken kaupunginkirjasto, 2008. 6. Matthews, Brander, ed. The Short-Story: Specimens Illustrating Its Development.New York: American Book Company, 1907; Bartleby.com, 2000. . 7. Maupassant, Guy de. The necklace and other short stories. Courier Dover Publications, 1992.

enzemes potato hydrogen peroxide :: essays research papers

How the concentration of enzymes controls the breakdown of Hydrogen Peroxide? Aim- We are investigating the effect of changing the concentration of the enzyme catalase has on the rate of breaking down of Hydrogen Peroxide. Background Info- This experiment will involve some soft potato. Potato has a very high enzyme count, that ¡Ã‚ ¦s why we use it in this experiment. This enzyme is called catalase. It is used in our body to break down food and other things that we might digest. A catalase speeds up the rate of reactions. The enzymes are all protean molecules. We will also use Hydrogen Peroxide and washing up liquid. The catalase breaks down the Hydrogen Peroxide into oxygen and water. The more vigorous the reaction the more froth that it creates. The reaction in the experiment: Hydrogen peroxide „ ³ oxygen + water 2H2O2 „ ³ O2 + H2O The enzyme can be used around the body to help chemical reactions, it speeds them up! The enzyme breaks up larger molecules into smaller pieces. This is how the enzymes work below I have described some of the things that can affect how well it works. Fair test/ Factors- Temp- This can affect the movement of the particles. The higher the temp the faster the particles will move and the more collisions. If the temp of the Hydrogen Peroxide is too low the experiment will fail! High Temp- It gives them more energy so they move faster this means that they are likely to connect the substrate and the active site. The high temp also gives the particles kinetic energy. This means that the Hydrogen Peroxide will be broken down quicker. Best Temp- This is the hottest the enzyme can be heated without the active site changing (denaturing). If the active site changes then the reaction will no longer work. From our preliminary test we found out that the optimum temp is 25oc this is around room temp. PH- All enzymes have an optimum PH, the wrong PH can cause denaturing. The Ph can ¡Ã‚ ¦t be too acid or alkaline so keep it as near to 7 as possible. If the enzyme denatures then it is no use for breaking down the Hydrogen Peroxide. Concentration of H2O2- The higher the concentration the more collisions with the active site. This means there is an increased rate of reaction. Creating more froth so the concentration will have to be the same for each of the test tubes.

Essay --

Certain factors such as symptoms, risk factors, and medical history of the patient help in performing the diagnosis procedure for determining encephalitis. Some diagnostic tests for encephalitis include brain imaging, lumbar puncture, electroencephalogram, secondary lab tests, and brain biopsy. Many physicians often perform brain imaging first when symptoms start to suspect evidence of encephalitis. When brain imaging is conducted, results frequently depict swelling of the brain. The doctor may call for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan or computerized tomography (CT) scan. A MRI scan provides cross-sectional images of the body and helps the doctor observe high-resolution pictures of the bones and tissues whereas a CT scan allows the doctor to go more in depth in observing the size, shape, and position of deep structures within the body. In a lumbar puncture, the doctor supplements a needle into the lower back to remove cerebrospinal fluid which is responsible for surrounding the brain. Blood cells and immune system proteins can indicate inflammation and infection in the brain...

Emotions

Collectivist countries Japan, china retreat emotions innate to relationship between the groups , Individualistic countries think emotions are not directed to them. Common emotions : anger, fear,sadness,happiness, disgust, surprise. Happiness Is confused with surprise. Love is difficult to convey In facial expression. Positive emotions (Joy and gratitude) and negative emotions (anger guilt) . Neutral state is non emotional. So if we group and -eve emotions they become your moods. Surprise can not be put in model cozy its not clear. High effect in mood structure will relate to excitement.As same high -eve effect can be related to nervousness, tense. And some hybrid emotions, contentment mixture of high +eve and low negative (serene, relaxed). So these effects color our perceptions which becomes reality and behavior. Air hostess example, Negative emotions negative mood . Negative experiences are fast to recollect. Positivist offset If zero input mostly people feel positive mood. China h as less of positive and negative emotions . Pride Is good In US but no In china. Emotions help you to make rational decisions, brain Injury people making Irrational decisions.Thinking + feeling rational decisions. Sources of emotions and moods 1. Personality : ms thong and Hartmann Sings shows different affect intensity 2. Time and day : +eve at end of week, negative at Sundays, in intra day positive mood peaks during the middle part . 3. Weather: illusory correlation : when people think two things are related whenever are not so moods are not affected by weather 4. Stress: stressful days affect moods negatively 5. Sleep: poor/reduced sleep cloud your decision and make difficult to control our emotions 6. Exercise: +eve effect 7. Social actively: 8.Age: emotional experience gets better as we age, more +eve episode and less -eve 9. Sex: women's reactions are personality based and men reactions are environment Why we see more +eve mood then negative moods 1. _eve emotion more when the y are alone 2. Reluctant to divulge -eve feeling in social situation Emotional labor: people who have to express organizational desired emotions . Air hostess Emotional dissonance : projecting something else then feelings Surface acting vs.. Deep acting (true feeling) ATE (affective events theory) : work place events causes emotional reactions +eve and – e will influence workplace attitudes and behaviors.So people who score low on emotional stability react strongly to negative events. So all these effects the COB, behaviors and workplace deviance. 1 . Emotions provide valuable insight into how workplace hassles influence employee performance 2. Employee and managers should onto ignore the emotions when they re minor as they accumulate. El is person's ability to perceive emotions in self and others,2, understand meaning of emotions, regulate emotions . Effective presidents US then failed presidents the major difference was El. Arguments in favor of El 1.Intuitive appeal: Almos t everyone agrees is good to possess social intelligence. Intuition is to detect emotions in others , control their emotions and handle social interactions. Are good in business world. 2. El predicts subject matter that high level of El means person will perform well on the Job 3. El is biologically based , people without preferential cortex have same IQ but lower CEQ Arguments against El 1. El researchers do not agree on definition : some use tests soon use self reports 2. El can't be measured: measures of El are vast 3.El is personality but with different label: El closely related to intelligence and personality it has nothing unique to offer. Emotional Regulation: individuals with higher personality trait of neurotics have more trouble to regulate the emotions . And people with low self esteem are less likely to to improve sad mood. Ignoring negative experience can lead to better regulation. Application of understanding emotions and moods 1. Selection : factor in hiring employees , especially in social interactions. Better El better performance 2. Decision Making: +eve emotions leading to rational decisions .Creativity:+I've mood leads to creativity more open in thinking 4. Motivation : +eve mood leads to +eve feedback which reinforces the +eve mood. Two groups puzzle example. Good to co worker and higher sale for selling firm 5. Leadership : leader if excited enthusiastic will covey optimism enjoyment . Help in promoting the vision to employees 6. Negotiation : so best negotiator should not feel bad about the negative emotion and develop negative perception for counter partially as that's will impair future negotiation . SO Emotions can impair negotiator performance.So arson phonies gage will be best negotiation as he will not be taken back by negative outcomes. 7. Customer service: emotional dissonance can lead to decline of Job dissatisfaction. Emotional contagion so +eve feeling of employee will be responded back +vela by customer and lead to longer shop ping. -eve feeling is also contagious 8. Job attitude: bad day at work means unpleasant evening with your spouse . People envy, anger leading to deviant behavior 10. Safety and Injury at work. : -eve mood can make you anxious, distracted and careless leading to injury. Managers use humor and token of appreciation to mitigate +eve mood Emotions Different people define emotions in different ways. Some make a distinction between emotions and feelings saying that a feeling is the response part of the emotion and that an emotion includes the situation or experience, the interpretation, the perception, and the response or feeling related to the experience of a particular situation. For the purposes of this article, I use the terms interchangeably.John D. (Jack) Mayer says, â€Å"Emotions operate on many levels. They have a physical aspect as well as a psychological aspect. Emotions bridge thought, feeling, and action – they operate in every part of a person, they affect many aspects of a person, and the person affects many aspects of the emotions.†Dr. Maurice Elias says, â€Å"Emotions are human beings’ warning systems as to what is really going on around them. Emotions are our most reliable indicators of how things are going on in our lives. Emotions help keep us on the right track by making sure that we a re led by more than the mental/ intellectual faculties of thought, perception, reason, memory.†Ã‚ · Why Bother With Emotions:Emotions control your thinking, behavior and actions. Emotions affect your physical bodies as much as your body affects your feelings and thinking. People who ignore, dismiss, repress or just ventilate their emotions, are setting themselves up for physical illness. Emotions that are not felt and released but buried within the body or in the aura can cause serious illness, including cancer, arthritis, and many types of chronic illnesses. Negative emotions such as fear, anxiety, negativity, frustration and depression cause chemical reactions in your body that are very different from the chemicals released when you feel positive emotions such as happy, content, loved, accepted. · Belief SystemsUnderlying much of our behavior is what is called a belief system. This system within us filters what we see and hear, affecting how we behave in our daily lives. T here are many other elements that affect our lives,  including past lives and the core issues we come into this life for resolution, but our belief systems in this life have a major effect on what we think and do.Your belief system affects your perceptions or how you interpret what you see, hear and feel. For example, a person raised by an angry man or woman will view people in the future with beliefs that anger is bad or that it is something to fear. Another example would be someone who is quite intelligent but who has never been encouraged or honored for their intelligence, this person might believe they are stupid. Men raised in conservative societies might have the belief that women who work outside of the home are not as good as those who do not work outside of the home.It takes a lot of work to look at yourself and identify the beliefs that are affecting your life in a negative manner. However, knowing your beliefs will give you a sound basis for emotional freedom. I do beli eve that it’s wise to deal with the belief systems before dealing with the identification and release of emotions. First things first! · Other People, Places, and Things Cannot Change How You Feel The only person who can change what you feel is you. A new relationship, a new house, a new car, a new job, these things can momentarily distract you from your feelings, but no other person, no material possession, no activity can remove, release, or change how you feel.How often do you hear people say things like â€Å"when I have enough money, I won’t be afraid anymore†, only to find there never seems to be enough money to stop being afraid. Or â€Å"when I’m in a secure relationship I won’t feel lonely any more†, and finding they are still lonely regardless of their relationship. We need to understand that we take our feelings with us wherever we go. A new dress, a new house, a new job, none of these things change how we feel. Our feelings rem ain within us until we release them. · Emotions Are Not the Only Cause of IllnessEmotions are not the only cause of illness. Little babies and young  children get ill, and not always because of their emotional issues. There are many causes of illness including emotions, but they are not the sole cause of illness.The causes of illness today are quite different from the issues causing illness 20 or 30 years ago. We are living in a world filled with chemical, metal, and atomic poisons, radiation, pollution, and pesticides in our food. We are bombarded with all types of electricity. These energies affect the physical, mental/ intellectual, energetic and emotional health of people.As we travel more, moving with ease from country to country, different types of infection causing elements are spreading around the world more easily. Infections of parasites, worms, viruses, and different types of infectious bacteria are many times greater than 20 years ago. Our water supplies are filled w ith chemicals and metals. The benefits of antibiotics have also brought with them the difficulty of the candida fungus overgrowth and other physical and emotional difficulties. The causes of illness today are different. · Two Basic Emotions In Life – Love and FearThere are only two basic emotions that we all experience, love and fear. All other emotions are variations of these two emotions. Thoughts and behavior come from either a place of love, or a place of fear. Anxiety, anger, control, sadness, depression, inadequacy, confusion, hurt, lonely, guilt, shame, these are all fear-based emotions. Emotions such as joy, happiness, caring, trust, compassion, truth, contentment, satisfaction, these are love-based emotions.There are varying degrees of intensity of both types of emotions, some being mild, others moderate, and others strong in intensity. For example, anger in a mild form can be felt as disgust or dismay, at a moderate level can be felt as offended or exasperated, an d at an intense level can be felt as rage or hate. And the emotion that always underpins anger is fear. · Physical Effects of EmotionsEmotions have a direct effect on how our bodies work. Fear-based emotions stimulate the release of one set of chemicals while love-based emotions release a different set of chemicals. If the fear-based emotions are long-term or chronic they damage the chemical systems, the immune system, the endocrine system and every other system in your body. Our immune systems weaken and many serious illnesses set in. This relationship between emotions, thinking, and the body is being called Mind/Body Medicine today. · You Cannot Control Your EmotionsYou cannot change or control your emotions. You can learn how to be with them, living peacefully with them, transmuting them (which means releasing them), and you can manage them, but you cannot control them.Think of the people who go along day after day seeming to function normally, and all of a sudden they will e xplode in anger at something that seems relatively trivial and harmless. That is one sign of someone who is trying to control or repress their emotions but their repressed emotions are leaking out.The more anyone tries to control their emotions the more they resist control, and the more frightened people eventually become at what is seen to be a â€Å"loss of emotional control†. It is a vicious circle.It’s important today to be politically correct. And that means not challenging or disagreeing with what the average person believes. It means not expressing negative emotions in public. Showing emotion in public in North American and European societies represents being â€Å"out of control† a great sign of weakness. People feel uncomfortable with those who express strong emotions. We are a society that is taught to hide our emotions, to be ashamed of them or to be afraid of them. Regardless, we are born with them and must live with them. This means learning how to know them, be with them, and release them. · The Difference Between Core Issues and EmotionsWe each come into this lifetime with at least one core issue to resolve.  Different situations will continue to present themselves in different but repeat patterns until you have dealt with the core issues in your life.A few examples of core issue are abandonment / victimization, demanding justice in all matters, living spiritually rather than materially. These are overarching issues that affect emotions completely. Many people find out about their core issues by learning to deal with their emotions. It is a gentle pathway that leads you into a deeper knowing of your core issues.